Duration
24h Th, 16h Pr
Number of credits
Lecturer
Coordinator
Language(s) of instruction
French language
Organisation and examination
Teaching in the first semester, review in January
Schedule
Units courses prerequisite and corequisite
Prerequisite or corequisite units are presented within each program
Learning unit contents
Learning outcomes of the learning unit
Prerequisite knowledge and skills
Planned learning activities and teaching methods
Mode of delivery (face to face, distance learning, hybrid learning)
Blended learning
Additional information:
Course materials and recommended or required readings
Platform(s) used for course materials:
- eCampus
Further information:
Course materials and reference works are available on eCampus.
Exam(s) in session
Any session
- In-person
oral exam
Further information:
Presentation of group work: critical analysis of a specific IWRM case study. Cases to be chosen by each group. Work will begin during class and be supervised through work sessions and discussions. The main points will be discussed and approved during these sessions; each group will develop the topic and present it during the exam.
The work will be graded as follows:
- Subject & Content (7 points): Does the subject correspond to an IWRM issue? Does it include the IWRM approaches, techniques, definitions, etc. covered in the course?
- Presentation & Analysis (7 points): How is the work presented? Is the structure of the presentation clear (situation, context, issues, actors, enabling environment, solutions, etc.)? Is the analysis correct and/or realistic (SWOT, Ostrom guidelines, etc.)? Is the analysis well developed and critical?
- Questions & Answers (4 points): Mastery of the subject by the whole group.
- Quality (2 points): Quality of the presentation materials (clear and legible slides, easy to follow, etc.) and quality of the oral presentation.
- 10-11: The work has many significant shortcomings, learning objectives achieved to a minimal extent.
- 12-13: The work has few shortcomings, learning objectives satisfactorily achieved.
- 14-15: Errors and/or inaccuracies are considered minor. The work accurately reflects the skills and concepts covered in the course.
- 16-17: The work demonstrates great rigor and originality. The results could be reproduced at a later date.
Work placement(s)
Organisational remarks and main changes to the course
Contacts