2019-2020 / PHIL0010-1

History of contemporary philosophy

Duration

45h Th

Number of credits

 Bachelor in ancient and modern languages and literatures5 crédits 
 Bachelor in ancient languages and literatures : classics5 crédits 
 Bachelor in information and communication5 crédits 
 Bachelor in modern languages and literatures : German, Dutch and English5 crédits 
 Bachelor in history of art and archaeology : general5 crédits 
 Bachelor in history5 crédits 
 Bachelor in modern languages and literatures : general5 crédits 
 Bachelor in history of art and archaeology : musicology5 crédits 
 Bachelor in ancient languages and literatures : Oriental studies5 crédits 
 Bachelor in philosophy5 crédits 
 Bachelor in French and Romance languages and literatures : general5 crédits 

Lecturer

Arnaud Dewalque

Substitute(s)

Charlotte Gauvry

Language(s) of instruction

French language

Organisation and examination

Teaching in the second semester

Schedule

Schedule online

Units courses prerequisite and corequisite

Prerequisite or corequisite units are presented within each program

Learning unit contents

Topic: The Sources of Philosophical Naturalism.
Where does the distinction between humanities and natural sciences come from? What, if anything, could make philosophy a "rigorous science"? Could its method be similar to that of the natural sciences? Or is there a distinctive way of addressing and settling philosophical questions?
Overarching the biggest part of contemporary philosophy, "philosophical naturalism" is the view that there is a strong continuity between philosophy and the natural sciences. Moreover, supporters of philosophical naturalism usually claim that the idea of a "first philosophy," viz. the idea of a kind of knowledge more fundamental than any particular science, should be rejected. Those claims, however, have been challenged by a number of authors.
The course aims at critically discussing the relevance of philosophical naturalism (Quine, Churchland, Dretske, Papineau...) by going back to its historical sources. Addressing in turn specific issues related to whether philosophy should adopt the method of the natural sciences, we will review the various rehabilitation strategies that have been proposed in post-idealistic 19th-century philosophy (Comte, Bolzano, Nietzsche, Brentano, Stumpf, Husserl, etc.).

Learning outcomes of the learning unit

By the end of the course, listeners are supposed to:

  • master a series of historical informations about the nineteen-century Austrian-German philosophy.
  • be able to look in a critical manner to the historiography of this period as it is available in classical manuals of the history of Western philosophy.
  • be aware of a small number of controversial problems which have had a crucial role to play in the birth of contemporary philosophy.

Prerequisite knowledge and skills

At least one Philosophy course.

Planned learning activities and teaching methods

The course involve a series of lectures, in most cases with powerpoint presentation. There is no syllabus available. The list of the texts  and the schedule will be made available at the beginning of the course and can be downloaded by following the link below.

Mode of delivery (face-to-face ; distance-learning)

Duration: 45 hours 2nd term

Recommended or required readings

A series of suggested readings will be made available at the first sessions (see schedule). The following list of recommended books may be helpful for students wishing to delve more deeply into the topic of the course:
- On the historical background of German-Austrian philosophy during the second half of the nineteen century:

  • L. Freuler, La Crise de la philosophie au XIXe siècle, Paris, Vrin, 1997 (available at the ULg Philosophy library: 43FRE).
  • M. Heidegger, "Genèse et première percée de la recherche phénoménologique", dans Prolégomènes à l'histoire du concept de temps, French translation. A. boutot, Paris, Gallimard, 2006, pp. 33-51 (50HEI.BOU).
- On the Brentano School:
  • D. Fisette and G. Fréchette, "Le Legs de Brentano", from the collection A l'école de Brentano. De Würzbourg à Vienne, Pars, Vrin, 2007, pp. 13-160 (45BRE.FIS).
  • L. Albertazzi, M. Libardi and R. Poli (eds.), The School of Franz Brentano, Dordrecht, Kluwer, 1996 (45BRE.ALB).
- On neo-Kantianism:
  • E. Dufour, Les Néokantiens. Valeur et vérité, Paris, Vrin, 2003.
  • M. Ferrari, Retours à Kant. Introduction au néo-kantisme, French translation, Th. Loisel, Paris, Cerf, 2001 (42KAN.FER).
- On contemporary naturalism:
  • D. Fisette, P. Poirier, Philosophie de l'esprit. Un état des lieux, Paris, Vrin, 2000, chapitre III "Le naturalisme et ses présupposés philosophiques" (cote 78FIS).

Assessment methods and criteria

For students in Philosophy, the assessment will be made up of two parts:


  • Part I: a series of reading reports (40% of the final grade) wich will be submitted during the classes. The schedule will be made available at the beginning of the course.
A 'reading report' is a short text (2 pages) presented as an analysis of a piece of reading. Each report will cover an article or chapter from the reading list given at the beginning of the course. It will be made up of three parts: (1) What is the main thesis of the author? (2) What are his arguments? (3) Is his position convincing? The aim is to develop the student's abilities of reading, analyzing and writting. The brevity of the reports makes it necessary to sharpen the focus and get to the essential. The compliance with academic standards (typography, style, quotations, references, etc.) is required. The criteria for assessment are: 1. understanding of the subject, 2. clarity and quality of language; 3. structure and internal coherence. Failure to comply with basic formal conventions (spelling, formatting, quotations, etc) as well as unmotivated delay will be automatically sanctioned by penalty points.


  • Part II: Final oral examination (60% of the final grade) during the June session.
The exam will take the form of a short interview during which students should demonstrate their knowledge of the subject matter covered in class and understanding of the course reading material. This involves, for example, situating an author in the philosophical landscape of this period, describing the main features of a philosophical school, explaining a concept, commenting upon an extract of text covered in class or developing a line of argument analyzed during the year.
For students from other disciplines: oral examination only.

Work placement(s)

Organizational remarks

All students enrolled in History and Romance Languages and Literature wishing to follow this course as an option are welcome.

Contacts

Teacher Charlotte Gauvry Philosophy Department 7, Place du 20-août, Building A1/2nd floor B-4000 Liège Phone 0032 (4) 366 55 93 E-mail c.gauvry@uliege.be

Adaptation of teaching commitments following the COVID-19 pandemic for the May-June 2020 session

Teaching methods implemented : distance-learning

As regard content, since March 15, I have uploaded my weekly course on MyULiege, including:
- a full write-up version of my course
- some recap slides with the key points.
Through the forum function of MyUliege, I answered some questions raised by the students.
Eventually, through a visioconference, students were able to confirm that the courses have been made available to them. In addition, we discussed how the evaluation will be performed.

Assessment subjects

Only the course material that has been presented during the IRL sessions (from February 4 to March 10) will be evaluated during the final exam. 
There will be also some "bonus questions' (which earn extra points) on the "virtual courses" sent from March 17.

Assessment methods

The final exam will be a written exam in 3 parts:
- a text commentary of one of the authors that have been addressed during the IRL courses
- a question of the IRL course material that will no require a pure restitution but also some critical assessment
- 3 "bonus questions" on the 3 virtual courses.

Contacts

c.gauvry@uliege.be

Adaptation of teaching commitments following the COVID-19 pandemic for the Aug-Sept 2020 session

Assessment subjects

Assessment methods

Contacts

Items online

Naturalization of Intentionality (March 17)
Cours virtuel 17 mars. Naturaliser l'intentionnalité

Nietzsche
Nietzsche

Cours virtuel du 31 mars sur Heidegger
Cours virtuel du 31 mars sur Heidegger

Slide 1
Slide 1

Slide 1.1
Slide 1.1

Slides 1.2
Slide 1.2

Slides 1.2
From Comte to Brentano

Slides 2.1
Bolzano

Slides 2.2
Carnap and Quine

Slides 2.3
Slides 2.3

Slides 3.1
Slides 3.1

Kant. §15, Kritik der reinen Vernunft
Paragraphe commenté en cours

Hume
Hume, An essay concerning human understanding. 

Dretske. Naturalizing the mind
Chapter 1

Nietzsche
Le gai savoir

Nietzsche
Beyond good and evil

Heidegger
Heidegger

Kant.Transcendental aesthetic
Kant.Transcendental aesthetic

Brentano. The method of psychology
Brentano. The method of psychology

Brentano and scientific philosophy
Lecture 4. Brentano et la philosophie scientifique

Brentano and Comte
Lecture 5. Brentano. Auguste Comte et la philosophie positive

Brentano on truth
Brentano on truth

Bolzano vs Kant
Bolzano vs Kant

Quine, Epistemology Naturalized
Quine

Quine. Two dogmas of empiricism
Quine. Two dogmas of empiricism