supervised works (level 2)

Duration

30h Mon. WS

Number of credits

Lecturer

Christian Behrendt, Sandra Berbuto, Christine Biquet, Frédéric Bouhon, Rodrigue Capart, Joëlle Decharneux, Marie Forthomme, Vanessa Franssen, François Gadisseur, Elodie Galand, Jean-François Gerkens, Delphine Grisard, Nathalie Iouck, Ludivine Kerzmann, Benoît Kohl, Marjorie Krzesinski, Marc Nève, Lorène Nickels, Michel Peters, Géraldine Rosoux, Arianne Salvé, Nicolas Thirion, Pieter Van Cleynenbreugel

Coordinator

Lorène Nickels

Language(s) of instruction

French language

Organisation and examination

All year long, with partial in January

Schedule

Schedule online

Units courses prerequisite and corequisite

Prerequisite or corequisite units are presented within each program

Learning unit contents

The student must write a single note or a case note analysis of a legal concept in the following subjects: criminal law, constitutional law, private law, contract law, European law and legal theory .
The work is supervised and evaluated by lecturers, all legal practitioners.
Course Coordinator, Mrs Lorène NICKELS

Learning outcomes of the learning unit

The course helps students learn to: - conduct a library research on a topic of specific interest, - read and analyze a decision of jurisprudence, - determine the scientific value of a source of documentation - summarize and write effectively about the synthesis of his research, -  improve writing quality suited to judiriques professions.
The student is responsible for its participation in learning.

Prerequisite knowledge and skills

The course assumes a thorough knowledge of French.
The course also assumes that the student is trained in documentary research, the use of legal databases and be familiar with the library. To this end, the deadlines of the course spread over the whole academic year have been fixed in coordination with the timing of the "Literature" course of legal methodology organized in the first two months of the first semester.

Planned learning activities and teaching methods

Two group sessions of training in writing are organized at the beginning of the year, to give students guidance methods and techniques of writing a case comment or a note of doctrine. During the first session, distributed the settlement of the container during the course organization, procedures and deadlines for submission of work, and the method of course evaluation.
Students are then distributed among the lecturers and the various legal matters. Each lecturer is a group session of the group of students to distribute the research subjects and explain his instructions for the drafting work.
A first version of the work must be filed before the Christmas break at the time and manner specified in the regulations of the course.
At the beginning of second semester, the lecturer met the student during an interview to discuss the substance and form of the work and communicate to the student improvement that must be done.
Based on these observations, the student is asked to correct their work and make a second version before the Easter break at the time and manner determined by the rules of the course.

Mode of delivery (face-to-face ; distance-learning)

Choice of the matter and constitution of the groups: the student will be invited to indicate, by order of preference, the matter in which he wishes to do the work. It will take account of these preferences as much as possible.
Attendance at training sessions and meetings and discussion with the lecturer is mandatory.

Settlement of the course outlines the terms and deadlines for submission of work. These are imperatives.

Recommended or required readings

Online informations :
https://www.facdroit.uliege.be 
Mandatory reference book : Nicolas Bernard (dir.), Guide des citations, références et abréviations juridiques, 6e édition, Waterloo, Wolters Kluwer, 2017.
 

Assessment methods and criteria

The evaluation of the student will be based on the final work, taking into account : - the quality of the version submitted, - through the interview meeting with the lecturer, and - the way in which the student will have integrated the comments of the lecturer in the correction of his work (final version).
The work must be the personal work of the student. Fraud or plagiarism results in a score of 0 / 20.
Is automatically cause for adjournment: - the failure to meet deadlines and the character limit, - the non-filing of a written work, - unjustifiable failure to maintain individual
Pursuant to Articles 42 § 2 of the General Exam Regulations, the student who has not filed two works and did not attend the interview is inadmissible 2nd session.
Second session: - the student retains the same subject and must submit a new corrected version of his written work, with real improvements.

Work placement(s)

Organizational remarks

Communications related to the course are mainly by ECampus and MyULiegeg.

Contacts

Secretariat of the Dean : 04/366.27.31 - bac.droit@misc.uliege.be

Adaptation of teaching commitments following the COVID-19 pandemic for the May-June 2020 session

Teaching methods implemented : distance-learning

pas de modifications 

Assessment subjects

Inchangée 

Assessment methods

Inchangée 

Contacts

Secrétariat du Doyen: Florence BREUWER - 04/366.27.31 - bac.droit@misc.uliege.be - bureau 1.71

Adaptation of teaching commitments following the COVID-19 pandemic for the Aug-Sept 2020 session

Assessment subjects

Assessment methods

Contacts

Items online