Duration
24h Th
Number of credits
| Bachelor in architecture | 2 crédits |
Lecturer
Language(s) of instruction
French language
Organisation and examination
Teaching in the second semester
Schedule
Units courses prerequisite and corequisite
Prerequisite or corequisite units are presented within each program
Learning unit contents
This course proposes a crossover approach between artistic practice, architecture and political science. In this course, the following contents are covered: Political, ethical and aesthetic issues in contemporary artistic practices (1960-).
-Urban artistic action
- Participatory artistic practice, infiltration into the public space
- Art, activism and transpolitics
- Stealth artwork
- Urban dérive, contextual art
-Tactical media
Learning outcomes of the learning unit
Develop a cross-fertilization approach between contemporary artistic practices, architecture and political science.
Understand the aesthetic and theoretical issues of contemporary artistic creation.
Acquire socio-historical knowledge related to the context of the creation of contemporary works
Build a body of artistic and theoretical references in contemporary art
Prerequisite knowledge and skills
ARCH3276-1 Théorie et histoire / Connaissance de l'architecture XXe siècle
ARCH0224-1 Introduction à l'esthétique philosophique
ARCH0323-1 Théorie de l'architecture 2
ARCH0324-1 Théorie de l'architecture 3
Planned learning activities and teaching methods
in progress
Mode of delivery (face-to-face ; distance-learning)
in progress
Recommended or required readings
Suggested readings: Agamben, G. 2008. Qu'est-ce que le contemporain ?. Paris : Rivages. Alloa, E. (dir.) (2010) Penser l'image Dijon : Les presses du réel Ardenne, P. (2002). Un art contextuel : création artistique en milieu urbain, en situation, d'intervention, de participation. Paris: Flammarion. Bénichou, A. 2010. Ouvrir le document. Enjeux et pratiques de la documentation dans les arts visuels contemporains. Dijon : Les Presses du Réel. Borasi, G. et Zardini, M. (2008). Actions: comment s'approprier la ville. Montréal: Centre Canadien d'Architecture. Bouriaud, N. (2003). GNS Global Navigation System. Paris : Éditions Cercle d'Art. Bourriaud, N. (1998). Esthétique relationnelle. Dijon : Presses du Réel. Danto, A (1989). La transfiguration du banal. Paris : Seuil. Davila, T. ( 2002). Marcher, créer. Déplacements, flâneries, dérives dans l'art de la fin du XX'siècle. Paris: Regard. De Certeau M. (1990). L'Invention du quotidien, tome 1 : Arts de faire. Paris : Gallimard. Debord, G. (1958). Théorie de la dérive. Publié dans Les Lèvres nues n° 9, décembre 1956 etInternationale Situationniste n° 2, décembre 1958 Harris, A.M. (2016). Video as method. Oxford: Oxford University Press Rancière, J. (1998). Aux bords du politique. Paris, La Fabrique. Réda, J. (1990). Le sens de la marche. Paris : Gallimard Stalker (2000). A travers les territoires actuels : Attraverso i territori attuali. Paris : Jean-Michel Place. Venturi, Robert. SCOTT BROWN, Denise. Learning from Las Vegas. Cambridge: The MIT Press, 1972.
Assessment methods and criteria
in progress
Work placement(s)
Organizational remarks
Contacts
Eric Le Coguiec
Eric.LeCoguiec@uliege.be
Adaptation of teaching commitments following the COVID-19 pandemic for the May-June 2020 session
Teaching methods implemented : distance-learning
visioconférence Lifesize
Assessment subjects
Opportunity given to the student to identify a subject in order to write a scientific paper.
Assessment methods
Assessment of a 2500-word scientific paper
Contacts
Eric Le Coguiec