2019-2020 / DROI2354-1

Introduction to American law

Duration

30h Th

Number of credits

 Master in law (120 ECTS)6 crédits 
 Extra courses intended for exchange students (Erasmus, ...) (Faculté de Droit, de Sciences politique et de Criminologie)6 crédits 

Lecturer

François van der Mensbrugghe

Language(s) of instruction

English language

Organisation and examination

Teaching in the first semester, review in January

Schedule

Schedule online

Units courses prerequisite and corequisite

Prerequisite or corequisite units are presented within each program

Learning unit contents

This introductory course to American Law is primarily aimed at students who intend to read law abroad in their future studies (as part of an Erasmus stay or in a post-graduate programme). Other students with a keen interest in the subject are also welcome to attend. The course spans key areas of American Law (Constitutional Law, Law of Contract, Torts, Civil Procedure). In terms of substance, particular emphasis is placed on the meaning of judicial precedent and common law reasoning. With a view to understanding recent constitutional developments in the United States, the course highlights the role of the United States Supreme Court, the delicate quest for a balance of power between the Federal government and the States, as well as recent cases delivered by the Supreme Court concerning individual rights.

Learning outcomes of the learning unit

By the end of this course, students should be able to:
1). present the fundamental rules, concepts, and trends of major areas of American Law (Constitutional Law, Law of Contract, Torts, Civil Procedure);
2). analyze precedent-setting court cases and summarize areas of contemporary American legal debate (jurisdictional problems, reproductive rights, privacy, ...);
3). develop informed judgment about the strenghts and weaknesses of American Law so as to convey this into reasoned advice to possible future clients.

Prerequisite knowledge and skills

This course is devoted to the American legal system. Students are requested to have a comfortable command of the English language. As such, this is not a "English legal terminology" course. The entire course, supporting material, and the exam are given in English, without any French translations.

Planned learning activities and teaching methods

The course unfolds in weekly two-hour lectures. Lectures are given with the aid of a Powerpoint presentation, available online prior to the actual giving of the lectures. Following the method of teaching given in Anglo-American law schools, students are kindly requested to read cases in advance. One class will be devoted to the "sources and methodology" of American Law. Part of this class will take place in the Law Library (please check the bulletin boards for the exact time and date).

Mode of delivery (face-to-face ; distance-learning)

Given in lectures, the course will unfold during the first semester, on Monday afternoons, from 4:00 to 6:00 p.m.
On their own, students will read one key judgment delivered by the United States Supreme Court on Monday, October 21. The judgment will be notified to students at the first class. It will be subject to group discussion and will form part of the material to learn for the final exam.
Classes take place in "Séminaire 11". The first class will be given on Monday, September 17, 2019.
The first class will begin with a short introduction, presenting the entire course.

Recommended or required readings

The course is primarily based on the following legal textbook: Gerald Paul McAlinn, Dan Rosen, and John P. Stern, An Introduction to American Law, Second Edition (Durham, North Carolina: Carolina Academic Press, 2010). Students may consult the book at the law library or purchase it through personal means.
Another reference book is: Erwin Chemerinsky, We the People: A Progressive Reading of the Constitution for the 21st Century (New York: Macmillan USA, 2018).
In addition, the course is based on extensive usage of a Powerpoint presentation, available on the website of the University ("myULg") at the start of the semester. A case-book is in the making.

Assessment methods and criteria

The form of the exam is an oral examination - in English - lasting circa 20 minutes. Students are requested to answer three questions. The first two deal with themes and/or concepts studied in class. The third question is based on the analysis of a case that students will have chosen and prepared beforehand. This last question will assess students' clarity of delivery, their understanding of the Justices' respective arguments, as well as their capacity to undertake research.
Students are not allowed to bring any documents (books, cases, dictionaries) or electronic devices in the exam room.
Upon appointment, a special exam may be organized for those foreign students who would have difficulty taking exams during the Belgian exam session.
All students are reminded that this is not an English terminology course. Accordingly, the exam will not assess their command of legal English. Notwithstanding, students are firmly encouraged to have a comfortable level of spoken English.

Work placement(s)

Organizational remarks

Courses are given on Mondays, from 4:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m., starting on Monday, September 16, 2019 ("Séminaire 11").
By way of reminder, students are invited to read, on their own, a key judgments delivered by the United States Supreme Court on Monday, October 21. The judgment will be notified to students at the first class.
Students are highly encouraged to participate throughout the classes. They will in any event be questioned - in class - on their readings of the cases given in class.

Contacts

fvdmensbrugghe@uliege.be
The office of Professor van der Mensbrugghe is located on the ground floor of the Law Faculty - level "0" (office R.35).

Adaptation of teaching commitments following the COVID-19 pandemic for the May-June 2020 session

Teaching methods implemented : distance-learning

Attending class online is obviously preferable to online learning. Since the course is given during the fall semester of the academic year, one hopes the Covid-19 pandemic will be resolved by the month of September 2020, with a normal resumption of teaching. Should this not be the case, lectures will be given online on the university's computer platofrms, with corresponding readings and exercises.

Assessment subjects

The exam will cover the material seen in class (whether in person or online).

Assessment methods

Students may have to sit the exam online should lectures be given online during the first semester. Everything depends of course on the lifting or pursuit of lockdown measures decided by relevant academic and governmental authorities in the fall of 2020. The exact details of an online exam have yet to be determined and will be communicated to students in due course.

Contacts

fvdmensbrugghe@uliege.be

Adaptation of teaching commitments following the COVID-19 pandemic for the Aug-Sept 2020 session

Assessment subjects

Assessment methods

Contacts

Items online

Batson v. Kentucky
Jury case...

Bush v. Gore (per curiam opinion + dissent JP Stevens)
Bush v. Gore: very important case regarding Presidential elections of 2000. Per curiam opinion + dissent of JP Stevens.

Constitutional Law (individual rights)
Individual rights as protected in the U.S. Constitution.

Constitutional Law (powers)
Separation of powers in the USA.

Erie RR v. Tompkins
Famous case on "federal general common law".

Federal Courts
Diagram: Federal Court System

Florida Bar v. Went-For-It (1995)
Case on lawyer advertising.

Intro + Civil Procedure
Introduction to the course + basic features of American civil procedure + the legal profession

Khan v. State Oil Company (antitrust law)
Stare decisis and antitrust law in the United States.

Kiobel case (case + questions)
Case on ATS.

N&P Clause and Commerce Clause Cases
Federalism in the USA.

Pebble Beach v. Caddy
Case on personal jurisdiction.

Shelby County v. Holder (2013)
Case on the Voting Rights Act 1965 (VRA 1965)

Shelby County v. Holder (2013) - Questions
Questions on the Shelby case.

State Farm v. Campbell
Case on the role of the jury and punitive damages.

The Jury System (and Damages)
Developments on the US jury system.

U.S. v. Dougherty
Jury nullification case.