Duration
30h Th
Number of credits
| Master in law (120 ECTS) | 6 crédits | |||
| Extra courses intended for exchange students (Erasmus, ...) | 6 crédits |
Lecturer
Language(s) of instruction
English language
Organisation and examination
Teaching in the first semester, review in January
Units courses prerequisite and corequisite
Prerequisite or corequisite units are presented within each program
Learning unit contents
This introductory course to American Law is primarily aimed at students who intend to read law abroad in their future studies (as part of an Erasmus stay or in a post-graduate programme). Other students with a keen interest in the subject are also welcome to attend. The course spans key areas of American Law (Constitutional Law, Law of Contract, Torts, Civil Procedure). In terms of substance, particular emphasis is placed on the meaning of judicial precedent and common law reasoning. With a view to understanding recent constitutional developments in the United States, the course highlights the role of the United States Supreme Court, the delicate quest for a balance of power between the Federal government and the States, as well as recent cases delivered by the Supreme Court concerning individual rights.
Learning outcomes of the learning unit
By the end of this course, students should be able to: 1). present the fundamental rules, concepts, and trends of major areas of American Law (Constitutional Law, Law of Contract, Torts, Civil Procedure); 2). analyze precedent-setting court cases and summarize areas of contemporary American legal debate (jurisdictional problems, reproductive rights, privacy, ...); 3). develop informed judgment about the strenghts and weaknesses of American Law so as to convey this into reasoned advice to possible future clients.
Prerequisite knowledge and skills
This course is devoted to the American legal system. Students are requested to have a comfortable command of the English language. As such, this is not a "English legal terminology" course. The entire course, supporting material, and the exam are given in English, without any French translations.
Planned learning activities and teaching methods
The course unfolds in weekly two-hour lectures. Lectures are given with the aid of a Powerpoint presentation, available online prior to the actual giving of the lectures. Following the method of teaching given in Anglo-American law schools, students are kindly requested to read cases in advance. One class will be devoted to the "sources and methodology" of American Law. Part of this class will take place in the Law Library (please check the bulletin boards for the exact time and date).
Mode of delivery (face-to-face ; distance-learning)
Given in lectures, the course will unfold during the first semester, on Monday afternoons, from 4:00 to 6:00 p.m.
On their own, students will read two key judgments delivered by the United States Supreme Court on Monday, October 23, and Monday October 30. The judgments will be notified to students at the first class. They will be subject to group discussion and will form part of the material to learn for the final exam.
Classes take place in "Séminaire 12", the first class being given on Monday, September 18, 2017.
The first class will begin with a short introduction, presenting the entire course.
Recommended or required readings
The course is primarily based on the following legal textbook: Gerald Paul McAlinn, Dan Rosen, and John P. Stern, An Introduction to American Law, Second Edition (Durham, North Carolina: Carolina Academic Press, 2010). Students may consult the book at the law library or purchase it through personal means.
In addition, the course is based on extensive usage of a Powerpoint presentation, available on the website of the University ("myULg") at the start of the semester. A case-book is in the making.
Assessment methods and criteria
The form of the exam is an oral examination - in English - lasting circa 20 minutes.
Students are requested to answer three questions. The first two deal with themes and/or concepts studied in class. The third question is based on the analysis of a case that students will have chosen and prepared beforehand. This last question will assess students' clarity of delivery, their understanding of the Justices' respective arguments, as well as their capacity to undertake research.
Students are not allowed to bring any documents (books, cases, dictionaries) or electronic devices in the exam room.
Upon appointment, a special exam may be organized for those foreign students who would have difficulty taking exams during the Belgian exam session.
All students are reminded that this is not an English terminology course. Accordingly, the exam will not assess their command of legal English. Notwithstanding, students are firmly encouraged to have a comfortable level of spoken English.
Work placement(s)
Organizational remarks
Courses are given on Mondays, from 4:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m., starting on Monday, September 18 ("Séminaire 12").
By way of reminder, students are invited to read, on their own, two key judgments delivered by the United States Supreme Court on Monday, October 23 and Monday, October 30. The judgments will be notified to students at the first class.
Students are highly encouraged to participate throughout the classes. They will in any event be questioned - in class - on their readings of the cases contained in the course book (McAlinn, Rosen, and Stern, An Introduction to American Law).
Contacts
fvdmensbrugghe@ulg.ac.be
Items online
Batson v. Kentucky (1986)
SCOTUS case on all-white juries...
Constitutional Law: Government
Developments on the three branches of U.S. Government: Articles I, II, and III U.S. Constitution.
Constitutional Law: Individual Rights
Developments on due process clause and equal protection clause.
Erie RR v. Tompkins (1938)
Federal general common law...?
Florida Bar v. Went-For-It (1995)
Case on lawyer advertising and sollicitation in the United States.
Introduction + Precedent + Civil Procedure
Powerpoint presentation covering the presentation to the course, judicial precedent (theme 1), and civil procedure (theme 2).
Jones v. Star Credit Corporation
Case concerning "unconscionability" and section 2-302 UCC.
Khan v. State Oil Company
Khan v. State Oil Company (7th Circuit, 1996) and State Oil Company v. Khan (SCOTUS, 1997), re. the rule of precedent and antitrust law.
Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum (2013)
Alien Tort Statute
McCulloch v. Maryland and Commerce Clause cases
Five cases relating to the apportionment of powers between the federal government and states.
Mercer v. Reynolds (2012)
Case on conflicts of interest in the legal profession.
Pebble Beach v. Caddy (2006)
Personal jurisdiction in the USA
Reading Assignment N°1: Shelby County v. Holder (2013) - SCOTUS ruling
SCOTUS case of 2013 on the Voting Rights Act 1965.
Reading Assignment N°1bis: Shelby County v. Holder (2013) - Questions
Questions accompanying Shelby County. v. Holder.
Reading Assignment N°2: Obergefell v. Hodges (2015) - SCOTUS ruling
SCOTUS case of 2015 on the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) and equal protection.
Reading Assignment N°2bis: Obergefell v. Hodges (2015) - Questions
Questions accompanying Obergefell v. Hodges.
Reading Assignment N°3: Voisine v. U.S. (2015) - SCOTUS ruling
SCOTUS case of 2013 on the possession of guns.
Reading Assignment N°3bis: Voisine v. U.S. (2015) - Questions
Questions accompanying Voisine v. United States.
State Farm v. Campbell (2003)
SCOTUS case on the jury and punitive damages in the United States...
The Jury System
Developments on the jury system in the USA.
The Legal Profession
Developments on lawyers in the USA.
U.S. Constitution
Unabridged version of the U.S. Constitution.