 | | |
| DROI1209-3 | Exercises (case-law article in public law and private law)
|
|
| Duration : | 8h AUTR |
|
| Number of credits : |
|
|
| Lecturer : | Christian Behrendt, Christine Biquet, Frédéric Bouhon, Rodrigue Capart, Joëlle Decharneux, Anne Demoulin, Marie Forthomme, François Gadisseur, Elodie Galand, Jean-François Gerkens, Antoinette Gosselin, Nathalie Iouk, Jean-Sébastien Jamart, Benoît Kohl, Marjorie Krzesinski, Jessica Loly, Séverine Masson , Xavier Miny, Thierry Papart, Nicolas Petit, Eric Pottier, Sophie Sequaris, Sarah Steils, Nicolas Thirion |
|
| Coordinator : | Antoinette Gosselin |
|
Language(s) of instruction :
|
| French language |
|
Organisation and examination :
|
| All year long |
|
Course contents :
|
| The student must write a single note or a case note analysis of a legal concept in the following subjects: criminal law, constitutional law, private law, contract law, European law and legal theory .
The work is supervised and evaluated by lecturers, all legal practitioners.
Course Coordinator, Ms A. GOSSELIN |
|
Learning outcomes of the course :
|
| The course helps students learn to:
- conduct a library research on a topic of specific interest,
- read and analyze a decision of jurisprudence,
- determine the scientific value of a source of documentation
- summarize and write effectively about the synthesis of his research,
- use the rules in use for references and citations of authorities. |
|
Prerequisites and co-requisites/ Recommended optional programme components :
|
| The course assumes a thorough knowledge of French.
The course also assumes that the student is trained in documentary research, the use of legal databases and be familiar with the library.
To this end, the deadlines of the course spread over the whole academic year have been fixed in coordination with the timing of the "Literature" course of legal methodology organized in the first two months of the first semester. |
|
Planned learning activities and teaching methods :
|
| Three group sessions of training in writing are organized at the beginning of the year by Ms. Steils, to give students guidance methods and techniques of writing a case comment or a note of doctrine. During the first session, distributed the settlement of the container during the course organization, procedures and deadlines for submission of work, and the method of course evaluation.
Students are then distributed among the lecturers and the various legal matters. Each lecturer is a group session of the group of students to distribute the research subjects and explain his instructions for the drafting work.
A first version of the work must be filed before the Christmas break at the time and manner specified in the regulations of the course.
At the beginning of second semester, the lecturer met the student during an interview to discuss the substance and form of the work and communicate to the student improvement that must be done.
Based on these observations, the student is asked to correct their work and make a second version before the Easter break at the time and manner determined by the rules of the course. |
|
Mode of delivery (face-to-face ; distance-learning) :
|
| Choice of the matter and constitution of the groups: the student will be invited to indicate, by order of preference, the matter in which he wishes to do the work. It will take account of these preferences as much as possible.
Attendance at training sessions and meetings and discussion with the lecturer is mandatory.
Settlement of the course outlines the terms and deadlines for submission of work. These are imperatives. |
|
Recommended or required readings :
|
| The power-point training sessions will be made available to students before each sessions.
Mandatory reference book :
Pierre Vandernoot (sous la direction de), Guide des citations, références et abréviations juridiques, 5e édition, Waterloo, Kluwer, 2010.
Others reference book :
Isabelle Defrénois-Souleau, Je veux réussir mon droit. Méthode de travail et clés du succès, 6e. paris, Dalloz, 2007.
François Grua, Méthode des études de droit; conseils pour le cas pratique, le commentaire et la dissertation, 2e étudition, N. Cayrol et F. Grua, Paris, Dalloz, 2011.
The settlement of the course, distributed to students during the first session, is also available on the website of the Faculty (cf. infra)
The student will also find the site a model of a cover page in a computer file (word) directly usable for writing his work (cf. infra) |
|
Assessment methods and criteria :
|
| The evaluation of the student will be based on the final work, taking into account :
- the quality of the version submitted,
- through the interview meeting with the lecturer, and
- the way in which the student will have integrated the comments of the lecturer in the correction of his work (final version).
The work must be the personal work of the student. Fraud or plagiarism results in a score of 0 / 20.
Is automatically cause for adjournment:
- the failure to meet deadlines and the character limit,
- the non-filing of a written work,
- unjustifiable failure to maintain individual
Pursuant to Articles 4 and 6 § 2 § 2 General Exam, the student who has not filed two works and did not attend the interview is inadmissible 2nd session.
Second session:
- the student retains the same subject and must submit a new corrected version of his written work, with real improvements. |
|
Work placement(s) :
|
| |
|
Organizational remarks :
|
| Communications related to the course are mainly by e-mail and MyULg. |
|
Contacts :
|
| Secretariat of the Dean : 04/366.27.31 - bac.droit@misc.ulg.ac.be |
|
|
| Items online : |
|
| Presentation Template |
| Website of the Faculty of Law |
|
|
|
| Rules |
| See the website of the Faculty of Law |
|
|
|
| |
