 | | |
| PSYC0061-1 | Animal and comparative neuropsychology
|
|
| Duration : | 30h Th |
|
| Number of credits : |
| Master in Biology of organism and ecology, in-depth approach, 2nd year | | First semester | | 3 |
|
| Master in Psychological Sciences, in-depth approach, 2nd year | | First semester | | 3 |
|
| Master in Psychology, professional focus in social, work and organizations psychology, 2nd year | | First semester | | 3 |
|
| Master in Psychology, Professional Focus in Clinical Psychology : Psychotherapeutic Process and Change, 2nd year | | First semester | | 3 |
|
| Master in Psychology, Professional Focus in Clinical Psychology : Cognitive-Behavioural Psychotherapeutic Approach, Clin, 2nd year | | First semester | | 3 |
|
| Master in Psychology, Professional Focus in Cognitive and Behavioural Neurosciences, 2nd year | | First semester | | 3 |
|
| Master en sciences psychologiques, à finalité spécialisée en psychologie clinique, 2nd year | | First semester | | 3 |
|
|
|
| Lecturer : | André Ferrara |
|
Language(s) of instruction :
|
| French language |
|
Course contents :
|
| Behavioural and cognitive assessment in a preclinical and comparative persepctive.
Designing a valuable animal model of any human neuropathology needs to consider the assessment of various functions affected by the development of the disease.
Study of the practical aspects of a specific situation (ex. episodic memory and animal model of Alzheimer disease; motivational, affective and sensorimotor assessment and animal model of stroke; ...). |
|
Learning outcomes of the course :
|
| As psychologist, you have to examine the development of the animal model of a neurodegenerative disease.
Through this work, the student must :
- present results from several exprimental works related to the assessment of the functional impairments in the frame of the considered animal model (precisely defining what is actually assessed);
- understand the methodological aspects related to the behavioural measures from which the cognitive functions are evaluated (advantages and drawbacks of the measures and possible behavioural biases);
- analyze the obtained results in the frame of a translational research or any comparative perspective (comparison with the human situation).
- possibly specify the underlying neuroantomical areas.
|
|
Mode of delivery (face-to-face ; distance-learning) :
|
| Written essay. |
|
Assessment methods and criteria :
|
| In consultation with the teacher, elaboration of a written essay.
Evaluation of the quality and clarity of :
- the animal model presentation quality.
- the clarity of the definition of the various behavioural and cognitive aspects.
- the comparative aspect (human-animal).
- ...
|
|
Contacts :
|
| Ferrara André (04/366.22.32 - a.ferrara@ulg.ac.be ). |
|
